Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:13:48 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? Message-ID: <20050811081348.2e37acbc.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050614191426.GB13306@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050613222428.GA3835@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AEA4DB.7020604@gneto.com> <20050614100144.GA1103@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AECA48.3090101@gneto.com> <20050614191426.GB13306@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:14:26 -0700 "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:15:04PM +0200, Martin Nilsson wrote: > > David O'Brien wrote: > > >>>>MSI K8D Master3 (MS-9161) > > >>It is very picky with the memories on the CPU that have 8 slots. MSI > > >>only supports 8 dimms on that CPU at 266MHz, 6*dimm at 333MHz. > > > > > >It depends on the revision of the Opteron used. Rev.E CPU's should > > >handle 8*DDR333 fine. > > > > Aha, nice to know I probably had rev.CG (2*246) as this was a couple of > > months ago. Are rev. E CPU:s out yet in models slower than the pricy 252? > > The slowest rev.E I know of is the 248. > I don't know what the speed of the rev.E 30W part is - probably slower. Was searching the archives and ran across this post. Also this from AMD website: <http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/opteron/details.aspx?opn=OSA244FAA5BL>; So it would appear you can get rev.E 244 opterons? -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050811081348.2e37acbc.kgunders>