From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 28 10:35:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC22106566C for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 10:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.barnardq@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9533D8FC17 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 10:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so19032fxm.13 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:35:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rs/SeK0FDX/ab1vVLwWrlr+s75+Dh+RkwLS8zcjQfIc=; b=tDvC7yqcbujWi5wV9+RFCnNxPfxgbUdPU/sfEeuP9GU46rC2mzExu5S2d+V0omHmi+ 5Ya/5KhA69DZEys0XWhHY12rRRpO/K5S4JRoqoxs/DXkl5wLKhjJa4eLiIr9n9mqBVdo ZFz5kXqc1FT6jgre5K37Z8aRPUb4E75/QYpqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ictJ/6B3ebObk3tRH+jTz12MxL06c7KhqBHxIaM4PkIN+g8cz/Osyd6wuo+Z0Kpt/5 tD39GSBK82RbODJX8IkkCYDoOPGvXrGAngalfL/CHzu0oRVLv8jqJUY66fsEjc0GjqXh Rn17Z878XjOOZQ7hNgA7sUc4eGWjS7w5V6cgg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.22.145 with SMTP id n17mr85834fab.23.1275041554506; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.105.146 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:12:34 +0300 Message-ID: From: Mike Barnard To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: bce+lagg X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:35:09 -0000 Hi, I am testing the implementation of link aggregation on FreeBSD 8.1 PRE-RELEASE and I see to be getting a problem with the bce interface. I am using an HP DL 380 G6 with 4 Ethernet interfaces. If I configure the cards individually, I can reach other devices on the network. When I enable link aggregation, I can ping the hosts IP address, but I cannot ping its gateway. my setup is as follows ifconfig_bce0="up" ifconfig_bce1="up" ifconfig_bce2="up" ifconfig_bce3="up" cloned_interfaces="lagg0 lagg1" ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport bce0 laggport bce2" ifconfig_lagg1="laggproto failover laggport bce0 laggport bce2" ipv4_addrs_lagg0="10.100.100.27/32" ipv4_addrs_lagg1="192.168.0.12/32" defaultrouter="10.100.100.1" static_routes="management" route_management="-net 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.1" running /etc/netstat gives me "host is unreachable". If I manually enter the default route, I get the same error. If i disable lagg1, I get the same error when I run /etc/netstat or try to enter the route manually, but, when I try to ping the default gateway, I get "device is busy" With lagg0 and lagg1 up, if I try to ping any of the gateways, I get "no route to host", but with only the lagg0 interface I get "device is busy" Is this a problem with the bce Interface or am I missing something. PS: I have an implementation running FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE with fxp interfaces and its working fine. -- Mike Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a million chances happen 99% of the time. ------------------------------------------------------------