Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:11:45 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: geom access method and g_topology_lock
Message-ID:  <50890251.8090402@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <94629.1351155886@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <5088E0E0.2080307@FreeBSD.org> <28185.1351150111@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FA15.30205@FreeBSD.org> <70960.1351154478@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org> <94629.1351155886@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 25/10/2012 12:04 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following:
> --------
> In message <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon writes:
>> on 25/10/2012 11:41 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following:
> 
>> To clarify, if that's needed, by "geom's access method" I meant the 'access'
>> member with g_access_t type in struct g_geom.
> 
> Ahh, sorry, I misinterpreted your question because I though the answer, as posed,
> would be blindingly obvious.
> 
> yes, that would not only be bad, that would be VERY BAD.

I suspected as much.
Thank you for the clear answer!

Now need to think hard how to avoid doing that nasty thing...
-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50890251.8090402>