Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:27:15 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg upgrade? Message-ID: <50BE5CA3.3050308@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <50BDA374.5090305@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <k9gigp$uqo$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BC4790.5010707@FreeBSD.org> <k9igqr$1ll$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BCCA1C.7010800@freebsd.org> <50BD10EF.3000601@infracaninophile.co.uk> <k9j802$nj8$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BDA374.5090305@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] > On 03/12/2012 22:10, Walter Hurry wrote: >> I think there's a problem with 'pkg info' irrespective of how the package >> is built. >> >> $ pkg info -s -F gcc-4.6.4.20121123.txz >> gcc-4.6.4.20121123 flat size is: 0 B >> gcc-4.6.4.20121123 package size is: 0 B >> $ pkg query -F gcc-4.6.4.20121123.txz %sh >> 567 MB On 04/12/2012 07:17, Matthew Seaman wrote: > It's clear that there is a flaw somewhere, but it's not where I first > thought. I need to recheck things more thoroughly on my work machine > which I believe was showing the same symptoms. Starting to doubt what I > saw yesterday. I just committed a fix to the release-1.0 branch which will be in the next release. Was already fixed in master. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC+XKoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz6UwCfYZKVirWDmIUatYqKkERDe3/u +2UAn0Mca2au+vpxgyvUcsz3v0+583NR =QoYg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50BE5CA3.3050308>