Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:34:58 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Ruud Althuizen <ruud@stack.nl> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: Default password hash Message-ID: <1651.1339176898@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:28:57 %2B0200." <20120608172857.GE2410@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20120608172857.GE2410@stack.nl>, Ruud Althuizen writes: >Complication isn't your friend when considering cryptography. Sorry, it's a one way relationship, and its the other way around: If it is cryptography, it is complicated. But it can be complicated without being cryptography. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1651.1339176898>