From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 29 18:04:16 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2220F16A4CE; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:04:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from hadar.amcc.com (hadar.amcc.com [192.195.69.168])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CCB6B43D46; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:04:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vkashyap@amcc.com)
Received: from mailhost01.amcc.com ([192.195.69.30]) by
          hadar.amcc.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id
          IFPZJ303.D68; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:04:15 -0700 
Received: (from vkashyap-pc [10.66.13.13])
 by mailhost01.amcc.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005042911042814747
 ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:04:28 -0700
From: "Vinod Kashyap" <vkashyap@amcc.com>
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:04:13 -0700
X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items
X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 51114 (9.0.6627)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <IFPZJ303.D68@hadar.amcc.com>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: RE: Problem with twa in HEAD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:04:16 -0000

> >
> >
> > In twa, state will need to be passed to the taskqueue =

> handlers since the
> > ISR clears the state on the controller.
> >
> >
> =

> Have it your way then, I'm frankly very weary of arguing with you.
> =


I thought it was more of a discussion.  If you think it's arguing,
I can't help it!