From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 24 01:33:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F61ADB8AC for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF2A11B2 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 07C7CADB8AB; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052B9ADB8AA for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC28011B1 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qVpqW0l24zZvV; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:33:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1458783221; x=1460597622; bh=N9JQ+jWorGWE+7zmrjZCPx09nBvVWgnfjcw SDNoTOZU=; b=ZYxFX5hbLSymCUjeqJEOBTYq2wAMvAl+ACL0VRlvZjd/ZgGogLy z3W5tMnjw0RcqrJnIZuteRzyUfem+06/WjNUDEHbnvK8A1vqlsZZ7gEbNRSz2Tq5 aoKFtNN7fI/3/OxrkYtYWgBrBxy9FEa5OPLt34gtB7H+sFyrulQHHJvE= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Teex3mXrWtFZ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:33:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:33:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: mail/roundcube (bsd.php.mk broken?) To: Mike Jakubik References: <56F3111B.4030901@madpilot.net> <3f72fc0f07e217ddb36190fa46b75d35@intertainservices.com> <56F33802.4070100@madpilot.net> <0ad88e191dc0cdf48ad3dda64fe4425d@intertainservices.com> Cc: Ports From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <56F343F4.1080603@madpilot.net> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 02:33:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0ad88e191dc0cdf48ad3dda64fe4425d@intertainservices.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 01:33:47 -0000 On 03/24/16 01:56, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On 2016-03-23 08:42 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 03/24/16 01:09, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >>> ports tree. I guess i can try upgrading to 5.5 and hope that my >>> applications are compatible with it. Sigh, FreeBSD has become a PITA >>> lately to maintain unless everything installed is bleeding edge. In any >>> case, thanks for the help. >> >> Sorry I beg to disagree. >> >> php 5.4 is unsupported upstream, and 5.5 will EOL in a few months. You >> should complain to the php project about this, not the ports tree, which >> is just complying with upstream. > > You are correct, however I think php is a special case, because it's a > slow adopter, sadly a lot of hosting providers have not updated and a > lot of software is still not compatible with the latest versions. For > example, the default version of php in CentOS 7 is still 5.4, so I don't > see why removing it from ports was a good idea. > The reason is it is not supported, bugs and vulnerabilities are not fixed, we would end up giving potentially insecure software, or even worse, software with known vulnerabilities. -- Guido Falsi