From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 3 12:08:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC4616A407 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B2943CA2 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so2464499uge for ; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:08:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lNIhYOphm8J5G+GqVTZrDUG9urzq7P5HZb7L9oyuZWdxecR6mRGmZIBYKUEKAdNpc7bDUgz6LfYVKXWGRNLdIsalVKJEY4yWXu9f81DLEoSSe63rioVc+xMRCqJGe2JkIJrsMsz3tbBQ9ejqINtOmE+MeFa0c5PTJ5xl4iro/ak= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr6662056hue.1165147699472; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.31.5 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 04:08:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2fd864e0612030408g32dd2d9dn295ae5889590d29@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 06:08:19 -0600 From: Astrodog To: "Julian Elischer" In-Reply-To: <4572A954.4060606@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4572A954.4060606@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: sched_ule completely hosed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 12:08:21 -0000 On 12/3/06, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Just checking that I'm not hallucinating and that sched_ule based > kernels cannot be compiled in any configuration at the moment.. > > (I see compile and link failures of different types > depending on what options are configured (e.g. KSE and !KSE)) > _ If you wouldn't mind posting the errors... that'd be great. I'm still trying to find someone to deal with ULE patches and such, but until then, I suppose I can post em here. --- Harrison Grundy