From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Fri May 12 01:04:35 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9227AD5EBCB
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 12 May 2017 01:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81EB8CEF
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 01:04:35 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4C14Zdw006073
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 12 May 2017 01:04:35 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 219228] EINTR on thread with full signal mask.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 01:04:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: parakleta@darkreality.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-219228-8-3N5jvkDwrD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-219228-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-219228-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 01:04:35 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219228

--- Comment #1 from Duane <parakleta@darkreality.org> ---
I rummaged a bit more in the code, and I might be on the wrong track, but it
looks like `reschedule_signals()` is called whenever the mask is changed (s=
uch
as when a handler is launched) and if the signal is still pending and in the
`block` set then `sigtd()` is picks an arbitrary thread if they are all
blocked, and then since the process wants to catch the signal (i.e.
`SIGISMEMBER(ps->ps_sigcatch, sig)` this calls `tdsigwakeup()` to force a
wakeup of the thread even if it is blocked from receiving the signal.

I think either `sigtd()` should default to the main thread rather than the =
most
recent, or else the `SIGISMEMBER` test should also check
`!SIGISMEMBER(td->td_sigmask, sig)` before calling `tdsigwakeup()`.  Or may=
be
both of these changes.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=