From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 4 09:15:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA15369 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 09:15:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA15363 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 09:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id SAA23109; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 18:00:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from knobel.gun.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knobel.gun.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA05169; Sun, 4 Feb 1996 15:53:54 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 1996 15:53:54 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm To: Warner Losh cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another Pentium gcc patch, -D__FreeBSD__=2 -Dbsd4_4 In-Reply-To: <199602032042.NAA12992@rover.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Warner Losh wrote: > : Ok, maybe one should remove __386BSD__ and not include bsd4_4.... > : but add -D__FreeBSD__=2 > : > : Would that be okay ? May I say that officially to the pgcc > : developers ?! > > That would make it consistant with the GCC as shipped by FSF and as > shipped by FreeBSD in 2.0R (and 2.1R). I think that to be a good > thing. Ok, I told the pgcc developers so. andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ - Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de - \/ ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz apsfilter - magic print filter 4lpd >>> knobel is powered by FreeBSD <<<