From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 06:33:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE7E106566C for ; Sun, 11 May 2008 06:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outI.internet-mail-service.net (outi.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77E28FC13 for ; Sun, 11 May 2008 06:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2008 12:14:40 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F972D6010; Sat, 10 May 2008 23:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48269354.80009@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 23:33:56 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bakul Shah References: <20080511061218.D62E15B47@mail.bitblocks.com> In-Reply-To: <20080511061218.D62E15B47@mail.bitblocks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcp over slow links broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 06:33:57 -0000 Bakul Shah wrote: > Sometime during the past month or so, tcp out over a slow > links seems to be broken and the symptom is really puzzling > to me! Here is my setup: > > A----B----DSL ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ DSL----C > [...] > > I looked through tcp related changes nn the sys commitlogs. > There are a lot of them lately.... However, this comment in > a checkin of 20008-4-17 21:38:18 UTC worries me :-) > > This change should introduce (ideally) little functional change. > However, it lays the groundwork for significantly increased > parallelism in the TCP/IP code. > > Trace 1 > ------- > 14:22:42.317406 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 4744:6204(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:42.317489 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 6204:7664(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:42.410739 IP C.ssh > B.55535: . ack 4744 win 64240 > 14:22:42.411144 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 7664:9124(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:42.411259 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 9124:10584(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:42.468350 IP C.ssh > B.55535: . ack 4744 win 65535 > 14:22:42.490556 IP C.ssh > B.55535: . ack 4744 win 65535 that is just plain wierd... B seems to have gone deaf. > 14:22:42.830171 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 4744:6204(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:43.470135 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 4744:6204(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:44.549944 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 4744:6204(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:46.509750 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 4744:6204(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 > 14:22:50.229210 IP B.55535 > C.ssh: . 4744:6204(1460) ack 2016 win 65535 have you made a kernel from each side of that commit and compared them? >