From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 31 16:41:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89AB16A4CE for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:41:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D56243D39 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:41:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6VGfANQ032335; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:41:11 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:41:13 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040731134951.GA95420@keyslapper.org> In-Reply-To: <20040731134951.GA95420@keyslapper.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407310941.13028.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Louis LeBlanc Subject: Re: Mozilla builds 4.10 vs. 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:41:16 -0000 On Saturday 31 July 2004 06:49 am, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > Hey all. I'm finishing up my RELENG_5_2 box, hoping to swap it in > tomorrow, and I'm a little confused. > > Mozilla 1.7 seems to build just fine in 4.10, but claims to be broken > in 5.2. It seems to have a problem with Calendar support. > > While poking through the ports directory, I noticed that there are 2 > index files (INDEX and INDEX-5). Now I haven't really researched > this yet, so feel free to point out the FM if that's discussed > somewhere. INDEX is for 4.x and INDEX-5 is for 5.x. When you upgrade and do a ../ports "make index", you build the appropriate one. KEnt > > My question though, is whether anyone has managed to get Mozilla > building without hacking up the Makefile (which still only gives the > Mozilla browser, nothing else). > > TIA > Lou -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html