From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Sep 19 11:44:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA09984 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lestat.nas.nasa.gov (lestat.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.50.29]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA09954; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lestat.nas.nasa.gov (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA07709; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199609191835.LAA07709@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> X-Authentication-Warning: lestat.nas.nasa.gov: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Julian Elischer , GNATS Management , freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/1643: Support for NetBSD in bsd.port.mk Reply-To: Jason Thorpe From: Jason Thorpe Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:35:32 -0700 Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 19 Sep 1996 20:36:30 +0200 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >Well, most NetBSD'ers I talked to objected to the name "ports", since in > >the NetBSD world, a "port" is then the kernel is made to run on a new > >platform :-) > > but, but, but.. that's an "architecture"... :-) Heh .. not in all circumstances... The amiga, atari, mvme68k, and hp300 are all m68k architectures... but slightly different platforms... You say potato, I say potato. :-) > >Is that really the only sticking point in the changes being accepted? > > You know, we don't really have any problems with this, why should we ? Oh, ok ... I just sort of had the impression that it was ... BTW, 64-bit clean libmd/md5 are on their way... :-) -- save the ancient forests - http://www.bayarea.net/~thorpej/forest/ -- Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912 NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935 Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939