From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 03:25:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1971E16A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 03:25:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF61543D2D for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 03:25:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25BP9xG060127; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:25:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i25BP7bx060126; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:25:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) Message-Id: <200403051125.i25BP7bx060126@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: To: tnelson@alcyon.ltd.uk Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:25:07 +0100 (CET) Sender: sos@spider.deepcore.dk From: sos@deepcore.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:55:08 -0800 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'S=F8ren_Schmidt'?= Subject: Re: CURRENT panics: Fatal trap 12 on atapci1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:25:47 -0000 It seems Trent Nelson wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Søren Schmidt [mailto:sos@DeepCore.dk] > > Sent: 04 March 2004 18:57 > > To: tnelson@alcyon.ltd.uk > > Subject: Re: CURRENT panics: Fatal trap 12 on atapci1 > > > Trent Nelson wrote: > > > > From the output I gave you, it seemed that I had a dodgy card that > > > wouldn't support memio, so you mentioned restoring support for the > > > old interface where memio couldn't be used. Has this been done? > > > No. Ihave had exactly zero reports of it not working besides your card, > > so it might be either its plain broken or something else is biting us > > Rebuilt with the latest sources last night which gets past the initial > panic, as expected, but we're still getting bitten by not being able to > identify the attached drives. Doh! I've just tried the two sii680 cards I have in the collection, they work just dandy, I'm at a loss to what this could be. > I'm fed up with this card, I'm going to migrate over to a Promise Fastrak > TX2000 over the next week or two. If you like, I can send you the SiI 680 > card if you're interested in finding out what's going on. If you dont mind the cost of shipping (I'm in Denmark) I'd appreciate the offer as I'd like to find out if that card is just bad, or if there is something I can do about it.. -Søren