From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 25 12: 1: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.netbenefit.co.uk (mailhost.netbenefit.co.uk [212.53.64.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F7337BA6B for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:00:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pierre.dampure@alveley.org) Received: from userek35.uk.uudial.com ([62.188.13.145] helo=alveley.org) by mailhost.netbenefit.co.uk with esmtp (NetBenefit 1.5) id 13H6WK-00082m-00 ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:21:25 +0100 Message-ID: <397DB073.EAC30BE2@alveley.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:21:23 +0100 From: "Dampure, Pierre Y." X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Stromberg Cc: Stephan van Beerschoten , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mtree -L problems in ports References: <20000725093521.A636@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> <7m3dkyo03p.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20000725151211.A44014@enigma.whacky.net> <397D9D94.8242C57E@rtci.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thomas Stromberg wrote: > > It's probably been fixed by now, but what I did when I first had the > mtree > problem was set NO_MTREE in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk - Not sure of the > side > affects though (anyone care to enligtnen me?) > > Im sure there is a more elegant solution, I was just looking for a > quicky. > It is not fixed. Th current version of /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.ports.mk still has an OS version test to determine whether to use the -L flag -- committed by Satoshi Asami after the initial "no -L, now -L" move. The move was later backed out, but not this change. The whole issue of mtree behaviour has been discussed ad nauseam on cvs-all. Up until a concensus is reached, it's most probably easier to locally override MTREE_ARGS. Regards, PYD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message