From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jan 19 6: 8:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF1337B402 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 06:08:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (sv.meiway.com [212.73.210.79]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 1795E6A90F for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:08:05 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010119150317.059d5ba0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:06:42 +0100 To: From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: Anti-Virus for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010119070958.01ce3230@mail.Go2France.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > I use Amavis-PERL-10 with Kaspersky and postfix and it works > > well. My IMGate group is trying put together a script, vs a FreeBSD > > port, that installs all of the numerous cast members (compressors, > > PERL modules, Kaspersky stufff) since the recent Amavis port for > > FreeBSD doesn't support postfix and apparently won't for some time. > >It might, if one supplies me enough information for implementing it. >In the docs supplied with amavis-perl, it says that relay scanning may be >performed only on postfix-current, and I'm not aware of its stability. I'd be surprised if any postfix user here disagreed with the consensus that Wietse's "current" is better than most "release". That's ime, and I haven't seen anybody in the postfix lists give evidence to contrary. Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 T9B for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message