Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:25:34 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: "hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding dehumanize_number to libutil Message-ID: <D0CADF5E-84FD-4B6D-8B66-19C34CCF013C@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgms69Jrc3gppLwWCx6PNYVMvW0NVsYYucFDgsmiT=XtMA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgms69Jrc3gppLwWCx6PNYVMvW0NVsYYucFDgsmiT=XtMA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dnia 7 lis 2013 o godz. 13:56 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> napisa=C5=82= (a): > Hi all, >=20 > NetBSD and DragonflyBSD have a function dehumanize_number which is the > inverse of humanize_number. >=20 > I'd like to import this function and switch some base utilities to use > it. Is there any objection? What's the difference between this and expand_number(3)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D0CADF5E-84FD-4B6D-8B66-19C34CCF013C>