From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 12 10:23:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pickup2-ld.pvd.loa.net (pickup.loa.com [199.171.167.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DE9537B407 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 424 invoked by uid 0); 12 Oct 2001 17:23:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pretorian) ([208.130.43.221]) (envelope-sender ) by pickup2-ld.pvd.loa.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <>; 12 Oct 2001 17:23:12 -0000 Message-ID: <008f01c15342$964a8e60$24b4a8c0@pretorian> From: "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" To: "Henrik Holmstam" , "Kenneth Wayne Culver" Cc: "Alfatrion" , "Hartmann, O." , , References: <20011012185458.K69352-100000@darkwing.turbo.net> Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER? Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:23:19 -0400 Organization: Log On America MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG good question ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Holmstam" To: "Kenneth Wayne Culver" Cc: "Alfatrion" ; "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" ; "Hartmann, O." ; ; Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 12:56 PM Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER? > > Can IPFW keep state on UDP and ICMP as IPFilter can? > > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Alfatrion wrote: > > > > > Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey) wrote: > > > > > > > I tried IPFILTER for awhile ...and it very easy to use...but ..in my opinion > > > > it isnt as configurable as IPFW. > > > > IPFW is a little more to setup ...but still pretty easy ...and the syntax > > > > isnt that hard to understand. Its best feature is its VERY > > > > configurable...and as long as you keep logging to a minimum ...it doesnt use > > > > alot of resources. > > > > Seems its memeory intensive than anything ...running a firewall that is > > > > > > > > > > I find IPF more configurable as IPFW. I don't know how to do the > > > folowing in IPFW: pass out quick on tun0 proto tcp from any to any keep > > > state. > > > > > IPFW has state keeping, but I don't think it's anywhere as easy to get it > > working right. > > > > Ken > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message