From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Oct 17 19:37:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from server1.huntsvilleal.com (server1.huntsvilleal.com [63.147.8.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8741337B4C5 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Spaz.HuntsvilleAL.COM (spaz.huntsvilleal.com [63.147.8.31]) by server1.huntsvilleal.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA19322 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:10:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by Spaz.HuntsvilleAL.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA20677 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:37:26 GMT (envelope-from kris@catonic.net) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:37:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Kris Kirby X-Sender: kris@spaz.huntsvilleal.com To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: X-Tech-Support-Email: bofh@catonic.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? ----- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | ------------------------------------------------------- "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message