From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 12 14:12:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA01278 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 14:12:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp1662.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01270 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 14:12:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA00834; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:10:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: tim owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 17:10:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: tim@localhost Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: Brian Handy cc: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/6282: xforms port checksum mismatch In-Reply-To: <199804122040.NAA29263@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Brian Handy wrote: > site, (#2 in the MASTER_SITES list) and it worked fine. If we've got > different checksums at different sites, that's a very very bad thing. Can You can handle this by putting two checksum lines in files/md5. Just be careful when updating with `make makesum'. -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message