Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:30:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Henk van Oers <henk@signature.nl> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508201521240.63690@ans.signature.nl> In-Reply-To: <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201508200724.t7K7OPaQ033554@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > I'm not exactly sure what you're all complaining about. The port just > works fine, it does take a few seconds for make to iterate over all > options, but it's because the port has way too many options. It's not as > if you're all sitting behind your desk looking at the screen waiting for it > to finish. Ok , sitting it out... [portsnap fetch update, portmaster -va] ===>>> All ports are up to date [root@mbox ~]# cd /usr/ports/www/apache24 [root@mbox /usr/ports/www/apache24]# time date Thu Aug 20 15:16:17 CEST 2015 real 0m0.004s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.008s [root@mbox /usr/ports/www/apache24]# time make clean ===> Cleaning for apache24-2.4.16_1 real 2m40.647s user 2m39.589s sys 0m0.688s [root@mbox /usr/ports/www/apache24]# time date Thu Aug 20 15:19:08 CEST 2015 real 0m0.003s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.000s Yeah \0/ finished ! But ''find /usr/ports -name work -ls'' is faster... (~1000 ports) Regards, Henk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1508201521240.63690>