From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr 22 04:01:15 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17061
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:01:15 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA17048
          ; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:01:12 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id EAA04757; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:01:10 -0700
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:01:10 -0700
Message-Id: <199504221101.EAA04757@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <11596.798533809@freefall.cdrom.com> (jkh@freefall.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: OK, the fake-pkg stuff should work..
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > Cool!  So you did it using pkg_create (that's how I was trying to do
 * > it initially, as I told you (^o^)).  It's great that we got this into
 * 
 * Yeah, I knew you'd notice that and say "I told you so!" :-)

Of course, I am too full of hot air to miss a chance to say "I told
you so!".... :)

 * For the long term, I'm not sure about the pkg_* stuff anyway.  I've
 * been saying for months that it needs to die and be replaced by
 * something MUCH more robust,

Well, I guess we need to think about the whole ports/packages scheme
after the release anyway.  Travis' idea is interesting, and certainly
worth consideration too.

Satoshi