From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 4 13:57:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C699F37B401; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:57:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E606043F75; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:57:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 7B8765308; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 23:57:52 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Kris Kennaway From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 23:57:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030404215301.GA37335@HAL9000.homeunix.com> (David Schultz's message of "Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:53:02 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 References: <200304041729.h34HTtVb027430@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030404173635.GA22147@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030404182223.GA36706@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030404215301.GA37335@HAL9000.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c support.s src/sys/i386/include md_var.h src/sys/i386/isa npx.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 support.s src/sys/powerpc/powerpc bcopy.c src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 support.S ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:57:55 -0000 David Schultz writes: > I don't care about the microoptimization if it's actually > problematic in some way. I just don't see why calling a function > that jumps to the address of a pointer is aesthetically better > than calling the pointer in the first place. Mostly because none of the other platforms do it that way, so we had to special-case i386 in which is supposed to be MI. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@ofug.org