From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 21:00:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4C416A417 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlt01+OZ=614239f4@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E09913C44B for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlt01+OZ=614239f4@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BC210554 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5096E5197B for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:42:58 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070929214258.046cbd3b@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: References: <44r6khh4xh.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: what cpu type to use for a intel duo e6850 (i386 or amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:00:11 -0000 On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:03:05 +0000 "Aryeh Friedman" wrote: > I have more then 4gb and was wondering why it didn't all show up.... > is there anyway to do a in place upgrade (I have a lot of user > data)... also someone should think about changing the naming on the > iso/cpu types since 20 years of industry experience (15 with FreeBSD) > and reading hardware.txt did not give a clue on this. What's confusing? i386 is for 386 compatible processors - a 32-bit OS for 32-bit processors, which is therefore limited to 2^32 bytes (4GiB) without the PAE workaround. amd64 is for AMD 64 compatible processors operated in 64-bit mode.