From owner-freebsd-security Tue Aug 21 12:15: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wlcg.com (mail.wlcg.com [198.92.199.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CAB37B40A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:15:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsimmons@wlcg.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.wlcg.com (8.11.5/8.11.5) id f7LJEif37192; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:14:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rsimmons@wlcg.com) Received: from localhost (rsimmons@localhost) by mail.wlcg.com (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7LJEh737185; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:14:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rsimmons@wlcg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.wlcg.com: rsimmons owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:14:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Simmons To: Matt Piechota Cc: Wes Peters , "Carroll, D. (Danny)" , Subject: Re: Silly crackers... NT is for kids... In-Reply-To: <20010821143517.L23909-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> Message-ID: <20010821150657.G21383-100000@mail.wlcg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Matt Piechota wrote: > No No, on the realtime machine controllers (QNX), or OCR nodes that need > all the cpu cycles they can get. I'm talking about the [de|en]crypt on > the remote side, not the PC side. Every bit or performance matters, and > could be the difference between us and someone else getting a contract. There should be a way to configure sshd so that only the username/password exchange is encrypted. The rest of the connection would be unencrypted. You would get some of the benefits of ssh without a constant performance hit. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message