From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 04:57:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AB916A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:57:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDED643D3F for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:57:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from manlix@demonized.net) Received: by av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 0536D37E4E; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:57:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.183]) by av9-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE7937E46; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:57:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from beard.demonized.net (h97n2fls33o834.telia.com [213.66.186.97]) by smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F1B637E70; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:57:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:57:25 +0100 From: Johan Pettersson To: Kai Voigt Message-Id: <20040315135725.3cc70f97.manlix@demonized.net> In-Reply-To: <20040315125121.GC91150@abc.123.org> References: <20040315134745.1eb201f4.manlix@demonized.net> <20040315125121.GC91150@abc.123.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg-based base system. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:57:28 -0000 If you want to remove it would be nice to have the ability to remove it with pkg_delete. Maybe I want to remove gcc, binutils whatever. I think the base-system should be pkg-based. It is much more flexible. On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:51:21 +0100 Kai Voigt wrote: > Johan Pettersson wrote: > > Wouldn't it be nice to have ha pkg-based base system? So you easily can remove parts from the base system, like openssh, ipfw, ipf, bind, sendmail and so on. This couldn't be too hard to implement. :) > > Why would you remove such parts? They all are small and don't harm anyone > when not being used. > > And "make world" after a CVS update is much more elegant than updating a > row of ports. > > Kai > > -- > dreiecksplatz 8, d-24105 kiel, +49-431-22199869, http://k.123.org/ >