From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 16:51:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514A016A41F for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A74413C484 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hzxxe-0001lh-JP for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:50:46 +0200 Received: from e177218201.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.177.218.201]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:50:46 +0200 Received: from rotkap by e177218201.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:50:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:50:11 +0200 Organization: yes Lines: 23 Message-ID: <4b5gk4-tkn.ln1@news.hansenet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e177218201.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O Subject: OOo in one big single package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:51:00 -0000 Hi, now we see, the the new xorg v7 is splited into a lot of small parts. Isn't it an idea for OOo to go the same way? Why is OOo such a big, single package on FreeBSD? On some Unix/Linux Systems, e.g. debin GNU Linux, OOo comes in several, small pieces. There is an OOo-core-package which installs the core-funktionallity, and the others base on it. Just think smart: E.g.: You often use OOo-writer and OOo-impress, und sometimes calc. You rarely use OOo-draw, OOo-math or OOo-base. So why You should install all those? Just an idea Heino