From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 29 14:15:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193811065690 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-chat-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B5F8FC20 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-chat-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 9279 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2009 13:48:51 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Jul 2009 13:48:51 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5D67E5083C; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:48:50 -0400 (EDT) To: spellberg_robert References: <200907281352.n6SDqXur017295@lurza.secnetix.de> <4A6F5C31.2000502@emailrob.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:48:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A6F5C31.2000502@emailrob.com> (spellberg robert's message of "Tue\, 28 Jul 2009 21\:14\:41 +0100") Message-ID: <444osvbnwd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: fbsd_chat Subject: Re: [ fbsd_chat ] Re: sh(1) documentation_set X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_chat List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:15:32 -0000 spellberg_robert writes: > dear mr. fromme --- >> > man_pages need to be, at least, "substantially_complete". >> >> I agree that the sh(1) manual page should be complete, >> and I think it is indeed complete. Do you think some >> piece of reference information is missing? > > ah_ha, you have arrived at my thesis. > > the man_page author states that it is not complete, in the first paragraph. Not really. What it says is that the man page is not a complete *specification*. That is not the same thing as being incomplete as a user manual. When appropriate information is noticed to be missing, it does get added (as you can confirm from looking at the checkin log for sh.1).