Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:07:01 +0300 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Use of devel/libreadline in ports Message-ID: <867hfc1b5m.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201012141136.19307.jhb@freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:36:19 -0500") References: <201012141136.19307.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes:
> Is there a push for moving libreadline out of base and updating ports to use
> libreadline from ports instead? The devel/gdb port currently has optional
> support for this but it breaks gdb if you have a binutils port installed as
> different parts of gdb are built against different bfd.h headers causing
> segfaults when gdb tries to load symbols for a binary. The simplest fix is to
> just remove the devel/libreadline support from the devel/gdb port if that is
> ok to do.
lang/gcc* search under LOCALBASE/include implicitly e.g. ports/136917.
This enables --with-expat automatically when its headers are found.
$ gcc45 -E -v -</dev/null
[...]
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "LOCALBASE/lib/gcc45/.../include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
LOCALBASE/include
LOCALBASE/lib/gcc45/.../include
LOCALBASE/lib/gcc45/.../include-fixed
/usr/include
End of search list.
Can you try to replace -I${LOCALBASE}/include with
-isystem${LOCALBASE}/include ? It should make GCC prefer ./../bfd/bfd.h
over LOCALBASE/include/bfd.h.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867hfc1b5m.fsf>