From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:41:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B567E43D69 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HHfRu21440; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:41:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kristian Vaaf" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:41:27 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:41:34 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Kristian Vaaf [mailto:vaaf@broadpark.no] >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 5:24 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: How would you improve FreeBSD? > > > >No need to be so FUCKING arrogant. > Hey, I was not trying to be arrogant, I was trying to be a smartass. Please keep in mind that your posting to a mailing list that is pretty well populated by FreeBSD proponents and when you say things like: "I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed." your asking for trouble. If you had said you were trying to paint a bright hopeful future for FreeBSD I would have been a lot gentler. But the language your using is pretty unambigious, in my opinion, you are basically saying point blank your here to cause trouble, well you got trouble, so why are you complaining? People don't come here to read gloom about FreeBSD, they can go to the Linux groups for as much of that as they want. I'm not exactly sure how painting a gloomy picture of anything is supposed to help matters. When I paint gloomy pictures of the GPL and of Linux's lack of support for SATA I am certainly not out to -help- them! :-) Ted