From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 16 10:20:02 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA18160 for current-outgoing; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 10:20:02 -0800 Received: from hda.com (hda.com [199.232.40.182]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA18145 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 10:20:00 -0800 Received: (dufault@localhost) by hda.com (8.6.9/8.3) id NAA04792; Thu, 16 Mar 1995 13:16:40 -0500 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199503161816.NAA04792@hda.com> Subject: Re: newfs: sectors per cylinder (4096) disagrees with disk label (36) To: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 13:16:40 -0500 (EST) Cc: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, terry@cs.weber.edu, phk@ref.tfs.com, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9503161816.AA21579@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Mar 16, 95 01:16:20 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 831 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Garrett Wollman writes: > > < said: > > > Actually, we do have them now. The documentation is inadequate and the > > numbering conflicts with the slice code. > > Then we don't really have them. I suppose, but then we don't have slices either and the SCSI code is in there. Given a choice between "We have them" and "We don't have them" I think we're a lot closer to "We have them". The reason we don't have documentation is that it conflicts with the soon to come slices and it doesn't make sense for anyone to start using them before the dust settles. I have the man page here. -- Peter Dufault Real Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267