From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 14:58:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959E7146; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7171EE43; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:58:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=+Zxw0RGsNL5UzFZ4s8YoWertfTUkxDLEGZMzn12LTpE=; b=oGl3TWIj+WyHUefzW2nhvCNBcoR+7Q3xBSwH3GePbIubVRDxGROEExlJBQkKKiXj9karr4R5tLiOZ0K0XKz0edis+rMwqIrnAzGcwZyXLSddOxBtuOhp2qHH9JYx5YebJHdulmaYGpUFhP4N1RVRre22jO8DCo8xESyYsIvI+SI=; Received: from [182.8.252.102] (port=32840 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XZhpb-0049Zv-Cf; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 08:58:12 -0600 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 22:58:01 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Allan Jude Subject: Re: no network connection from inside a jail Message-ID: <20141002225801.32ccc889@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <542D6539.4020904@freebsd.org> References: <20141002180506.4965760b@X220.alogt.com> <542D6539.4020904@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:58:13 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:46:17 -0400 Allan Jude wrote: > On 2014-10-02 06:05, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > despite having > > > > security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1 > > > Isn't allow_raw_sockets a per-jail setting via the new jail.conf > system now? > > When you upgraded to 10.1 was it from 9? > no, I upgraded from something like BETA1 oder even BETA2. All I did in parallel was a compilation for a Raspberry. But these obejcts are all in a different directory and should not interfere here at all. I recompiled meanwhile and reinstalled 10.1 BETA3 with the same result. Erich