From owner-freebsd-zope@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 29 13:49:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: zope@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E92106566C; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.freebsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184A78FC15; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so5641759dad.13 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 06:49:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=PYERKUGM/3ZOh3X5+YG9z8/MnYaWgU3ELXQiVy67UaQ=; b=hmkv4+Cj17e+XigyfCCeNEksvkSZAAYNKvOQeV1OXw1eXNVFhJud59FXCKi1/VaxJk ReVsVtJjMvM/AC1MzG6Yl7WR9u6Rxo9BHc/Ki9HWKLt/3HRBfmIqfN9gvLrzzsmheQau aNM8MwzZe2WWwe0xmLlltCA9S4fbs1luqtmIlSqRM63nR2ggY6Rp3OBWeJ6SjeLAU+lt GjrvtLuJ+sXnaNkG67BfMNY0w33EqPqnQ91XjmlScyOLWvPva30EweoDfntOLRqKbr5n rWTKF4uqtaGjkORrbmPPuT8GrAAlT95pxmkpal4NQs8O9Yf4RkYM6mLuqujy/TsEh5KH 511w== Received: by 10.68.201.195 with SMTP id kc3mr6576336pbc.33.1338299386246; Tue, 29 May 2012 06:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([175.142.170.59]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qr2sm22905070pbb.19.2012.05.29.06.49.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 29 May 2012 06:49:45 -0700 (PDT) References: <20120528174458.5300cfbd.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FC3B25A.2020004@yandex.ru> <20120529070211.1308b19d.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <20120529132848.GA11999@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20120529132848.GA11999@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <78A7CC3E-05AC-4D8A-B619-72BCD1BE5618@googlemail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Martin Wilke Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:49:34 +0800 To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: "skreuzer@FreeBSD.org" , "zope@freebsd.org" , "python@freebsd.org" , Ruslan Mahmatkhanov , Martin Wilke Subject: Re: [PATCH] python2.4 removal zope and zope211 affected X-BeenThere: freebsd-zope@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Zope for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:49:47 -0000 Latest sunday night. Sent from my iPhone On May 29, 2012, at 21:28, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:02:11 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:51:23 +0800 >> Li-Wen Hsu wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, Martin, >>>> >>>> Martin Wilke wrote on 28.05.2012 13:44: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Finally I'm working on to remove python 24 from the ports tree, >>>>> and the reasons are clear. Support was dropped by 2008, and there >>>>> are a lot of unpatched security holes. We have warned about this >>>>> since 2 years ago, and now I will really take action to drop it >>>>> from the ports tree. >>>> >>>> I have no objections, but know people that do :). I ever know >>>> FreeBSD committer that using old zope. >>> >>> I apologies jumping to conclusion too quick, and totally forget about >>> setting DEPRECATED thing. I agree to set it as an official >>> announcement, and we can wait another month, I believe this is the >>> final time of postpone. >> >> Nope, we have already mention that ever and ever and ever again, this >> time i dont do that where a problem with that is this time not mine, >> the python@ histroy can prove that. I wont postpone it again!!!! >> >>> >>>> We have only three ports, that wish exactly python 2.4 version: >>>> >>>> net/honeyd (skreuzer@FreeBSD.org) >> >> I wrote him yesterday a mail. no reply, but just in case that port can >> live without python 24 >> >>>> www/zope (estartu@augusta.de) >>>> www/zope211 (estartu@augusta.de) >>> >>> miwi has written a mail to estartu@augusta.de, I am not sure about if >>> skreuzer (CC'd) >>> know this plan. > > I do not strongly object about removing without setting DEPRECATED, but > we will wait for these two maintainer reply or maintainer timeout, right? > We just notified them yesterday. > > When do you plan to commit your patch? > > -- > Li-Wen Hsu > http://lwhsu.org