From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 14 14:21:59 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D02106566B
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:21:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net)
Received: from swip.net (mailfe07.swip.net [212.247.154.193])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D628FC23
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 []
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=GdtqiKf97NUA:10
	a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=FUEoquDKuWGG4oh1sLcA:9
	a=PDpIfzlt6djI12S4lwF1_9Uixj4A:4
Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO
	laptop.adsl.tele2.no)
	by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13)
	with ESMTPA id 1298523545; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:21:55 +0200
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:24 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; )
References: <200909031340.n83Defkv034013@svn.freebsd.org>
	<200909121009.22931.hselasky@c2i.net>
	<200909140852.49192.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200909140852.49192.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Face: (%<A9p'; 5>:6u[ldzJ`0qjD7sCkfdMmD*RxpO<Q0yAl~?`'F?jDVb]E6TQ7'#h-VlLs}k/
	(yxg(p!IL.`#ng"%`BMrham7%UK,}VH\wUOm=^>wEEQ+KWt[{J#x6ow~JO:,zwp.(t; @Aq
	:4:&nFCgDb8[3oIeTb^'",;u{5{}C9>"PuY\)!=#\u9SSM-nz8+SR~B\!qBv
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200909141522.25635.hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: NEWBUS states (was Re: svn commit: r196779 - in head/sys: kern
	sys)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:21:59 -0000

On Monday 14 September 2009 14:52:48 John Baldwin wrote:

>
> I think bus_generic_detach() needs to work when called from a foo_detach()
> routine, so I think you don't need the USB changes.  Even if the new states
> get reintroduced bus_generic_detach() will still have to work correctly the
> way you had used it.

Ok.

--HPS