From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 27 9:34:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D813037B422 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 09:34:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4RGYkZ22951; Sun, 27 May 2001 11:34:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 11:34:46 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Matt Bedynek Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0current Message-ID: <20010527113445.B6267@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (May 27), Matt Bedynek said: > is it possible to use the 5.0-current kernel with releases such as > 4.3? I would like to take advantage of the SMP optimizations that are > in 5.0current. -current is too unstable at the moment to try and use on a production system, and I don't think SMP is any faster than 4.* right now, either. Most of the kernel still requires the Giant lock. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message