From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Dec 17 9:15:33 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 17 09:15:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moya.hans.org (e165253.upc-e.chello.nl [213.93.165.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E7437B400 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 09:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by moya.hans.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DE3E03642A; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:15:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:15:21 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla and 4.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <20001217181521.A35032@moya.hans.org> References: <976986477.3a3ba16db730c@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <20001217051120.A20812@citusc.usc.edu> <20001217150650.B19311@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001217150650.B19311@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>; from sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu on Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 03:06:50PM +0100 From: H.Lambermont@chello.nl (H) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Szilveszter Adam wrote: > A gdb(1) trace shows that the segfault is in the internal functions of > nspr, so it is possibly not a C++ problem. Once the stack trace went > as deep as libc_r, however. > > Since the Mozilla team has dropped all FreeBSD tinderboxes from their > cluster (although they have added OpenBSD 2.5 back) they are probably > totally unaware of the problems. Well, I complained about this in their nspr newsgroup: See the thread news://news.mozilla.org/3A37A3DB.3E457946%40blender.nl It seems to boil down to "Fatal error 'siglongjmp()ing between thread contexts is undefined by POSIX 1003.1'" in libc_r Hans Lambermont -- http://hans.mypage.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message