From owner-cvs-ports Sat Nov 15 06:01:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA04241 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 06:01:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA03818; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 05:57:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA26057; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 16:57:42 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 16:57:37 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Satoshi Asami cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4 Makefile ports/www/netscape4/files md5 In-Reply-To: <199711151250.EAA03668@bubble.didi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 15 Nov 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > And how do you distribute your packages to N machines? Oh, NFS is > evil. So you use rcp? Cool. Can you use rcp to distribute the > package? Cool. And how long does it take you to build+install > netscape4? And how long does it take for you to pkg_add it? > > You see my point? I see no point but rhetoric effort instead. NFS is evil for run-time, but can be good for distributing. Even rcp saves N*build+install times. > Anyway, this is getting way too silly. I will split up netscape4 into > communicator and navigator, you take care of the communicator and I'll > work on the navigator. Cool? I complain not about merged ports but about invalid PLIST for navigator port. If you still not change PLIST making ports splitting my complaints are still active. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/