Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Sep 2003 02:35:56 +0900
From:      KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
To:        Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PRs  ports/56767...56858
Message-ID:  <20030915023557.5434f58c.tkato@prontomail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F6479F7.6040706@fillmore-labs.com>
References:  <20030914153245.79ba8838.tkato@prontomail.com> <3F644E7A.1040806@fillmore-labs.com> <20030914230644.447e9891.tkato@prontomail.com> <3F6479F7.6040706@fillmore-labs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:23:51 +0200
Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> wrote:

> You mean PR ports/34988?
> 
> I have a similar PR 56600:
>   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/56600
> 
> I can't see how this relates to "ECHO -> ECHO_MSG", though.

As far as I guess, ECHO_MSG or ECHO_CMD should have to be
used instead of ECHO in ports Makefile. In other words,
-s flag must be ignored by default. It appears there is no
documentary evidence, though.

> When I use the -s flag, I want make to work, but silent.

The function you want is availabe if "ECHO_MSG=${ECHO}" is
added to /etc/make.conf. Perhaps this way is appropriate
to become default value....



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030915023557.5434f58c.tkato>