Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:02:04 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ImageMagick bump Message-ID: <20070505210204.GA38903@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070505205432.GA4899@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070505170012.GA62735@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389743.55607.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505183147.GA20810@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389962.55607.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505185138.GA21388@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178391323.55607.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505190103.GB21388@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178397620.55607.19.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505205432.GA4899@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:54:32PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:40:20PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 15:01 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:51 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt get bumped, > > > > > > > > > can you confirm? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies on > > > > > > > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (otherwise > > > > > > > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la files again) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not. There are > > > > > > > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optional disabled > > > > > > > > dependency. I will recheck my script to see why some ports were not > > > > > > > > bumped. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the problem. My script didn't take DISTVERSION into account. I > > > > > > will send out a new, complete tarball shortly. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe a diff against previous bumpage would be better, if > > > > > possible...flz? > > > > > > > > That would be very hard to generate at this point. I mean, it would be > > > > trivial if I was allowed to re-bump the ports that had already been > > > > bumped. Otherwise I'd have to manually fiddle with my list. > > > > > > OK, I guess flz will just have to cope :) > > > > New diffs are up: > > > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg.diff.bz2 (full diff) > > http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/ports_xorg_incr.diff.bz2 (incremental > > diff on top of last diff) > > transcode is still missing :( I guess this is because it doesn't enable ImageMagick by default but instead autodetects it if it is present. This kind of thing is going to be a nightmare to track down. I wonder if we should just bump everything that installs a .la in case the port has some obscure case in which it will pick up a dependency on X11R6. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070505210204.GA38903>