From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 10:41:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FD5106564A for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DD78FC26 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvg11 with SMTP id 11so5278916pvg.13 for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:41:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WljxUBisCMWthlgo9f5sDJkGAwpqZ1u9lajixukDVRI=; b=KtJZjFLcA5fmsYzR+DNyYJqYOM3JM3kWWW14GW0w6/4WVDFoyf1iuMbWeGNc5Y7MwF /xrpLezT/iZ/BsrWwZtSlD/vjQ23m/kPIbe6w7o5W2X00A7EIbkfrqj2Dh6hDseCt4uv gjO284AzC1eNgAfPEEEV84QIM4qL32QyRPnAs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.35.103 with SMTP id g7mr6015868pbj.471.1309689704539; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.47.138 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:41:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110702193724.5c55a6c9@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <20110702193724.5c55a6c9@kan.dnsalias.net> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 12:41:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YKR5ieRol6Ofj4O8RDVqdikg8v8 Message-ID: From: Robert Millan To: Alexander Kabaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] __FreeBSD_kernel__ X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:41:45 -0000 2011/7/3 Alexander Kabaev : > GCC is on the way to be > pushed out into ports in FreeBSD and it will not the the only usable > compiler before long. Your proposal will force similar changes in > Clang, Path64 and PCC, , to be really universal which is not > practical. Would my proposal be more welcome if it included a patch for Clang, Path64 and PCC as well? -- Robert Millan