Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 13:23:40 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: g_disk_done() vs a destroyed disk Message-ID: <33960.1485609820@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <8de79017-f0b0-c86a-93c5-65be4d97b21c@FreeBSD.org> References: <cba9c9bf-97ad-e3ae-e209-ea91e49b5822@FreeBSD.org> <31395.1485554104@critter.freebsd.dk> <8de79017-f0b0-c86a-93c5-65be4d97b21c@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <8de79017-f0b0-c86a-93c5-65be4d97b21c@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapo= n wri tes: >So, the correct sequence should be: >- call disk_gone() to prevent new I/O >- handle all in-flight I/O >- call disk_destroy() >Is that right? exactly! -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33960.1485609820>