From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 6 12: 5:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D27D15037 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 12:05:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4421A1C4F; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 14:06:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D7B381B; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 14:06:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 14:06:14 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Dennis Cc: Matthew Dillon , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) In-Reply-To: <199912061939.OAA22030@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Dennis wrote: > Of course moving to -current to fix the problems in 3.x introduce a whole > new set of problems, in which case you have an OS that is never going to be > stable. When 4.0 is released we'll be told that the problems of 4.0 are > fixed in -current. When does it end? A rose by any other name.... 4.0 will soon be 4.0-{RELEASE,STABLE} will it be okay for you to use then? When does it end? Hopefully never. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message