From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 1 19:33:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C0916A445 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 19:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2B243D77 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 19:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x3so2920696nzd for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 12:32:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ueV1GxrVGfeB+GC7kl0TlstfeWOsliSK30D7wcQ9PiAntJiuOrV0eQp2FE6nM9nolMnkhGMDCxDcQ4P9Iyw0VJaCgKyq5t2eR1nj564lvT/euHJqNpoorHWoAOOIK3X4TZ+QRbBAyLlgUTs1Av5qct1lQKcQrFIGRFWsTbbTTGA= Received: by 10.36.129.3 with SMTP id b3mr1154208nzd; Mon, 01 May 2006 12:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.22.74 with HTTP; Mon, 1 May 2006 12:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:32:55 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: "FreeBSD Ports" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: portversion and distversion - why not? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 19:33:11 -0000 Portlint says: FATAL: Makefile: either PORTVERSION or DISTVERSION must be specified, not b= oth. Can somebody please explain why? It comes in handy to be able to define illegal distversion instead of redefining the whole distname. B.p.m was designed to handle two different variables in the first place. Should we really abstain from using this functionality?