Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 15:52:43 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCWeek article by Anne Chen -- Comments Message-ID: <4.2.0.37.19990505155002.04424e90@localhost> In-Reply-To: <19990505213955.KWWB7202931.mta1-rme@wocker> References: <4.2.0.37.19990505143833.04511280@localhost> <199905051822.NAA12099@free.pcs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:37 AM 5/6/99 +1200, Dan Langille wrote: >From what I've read, it is not only the "NOMINAL leadership" which opposes >your tactics. It appears to be much wider than the leadership. Not based on my e-mail. It seems mainly to be a few of the leaders and then some flamers. I get a great deal of support via private e-mail from people who don't want to get flamed. Look what happened to Mike Avery. One posting -- and WHAM. And it was a good posting, too. >As for "effective tactics", it is the definitiion of effective which >appears to be in dispute. Specifically the tactics you propose (and which >presumably you assume to be effective) are not deemed to be effective by >large numbers of people. The difference is that I have proof. The increasing popularity of Linux and the demise of OS/2 are clear demonstrations of what works and what does not. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.37.19990505155002.04424e90>