From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 15:25:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8B216A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:25:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C889043D48 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB15C2213A3 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:25:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96024-19 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:25:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A1821D364 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:25:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:25:24 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org> In-Reply-To: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:25:30 -0000 --nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 18 June 2005 06:24 am, Luciano Musacchio wrote: > I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :) My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and isn't hamper= ed=20 by bizarre licensing and enormous egos. =46urthermore, Qmail seems to have earned its reputation for security the=20 standard DJB way: by implementing only the easy parts of the standard and=20 complaining loudly about the hard parts ("those are insecure!") until=20 everyone quits asking for them. > Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do anyo= ne > know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail? All technical debates aside, Qmail isn't F/OSS software. They couldn't shi= p=20 it without getting a custom license. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCtDzl5sRg+Y0CpvERAryCAKCTEZf4ZbuR3CPHPaaeqDS6TNfL5ACdG7Ry LjreLJIkko5QwPh4txS7rWU= =Ht9i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2912223.uk5iz9ftoU--