From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:45:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 393ED8F2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C24E0E22 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from walrus.pepperland ([81.217.76.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2LZc-1XsEpK3nPA-00s5LK; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:45:06 +0100 From: Stefan Ehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mPFMV+Ikt85QKhPjQWZI0IcpwT+V6NUg04NhFFWe87Up+UtywYD m2Ll89CzWec9hr8plNTqVLOMdKWq/jdAn6Wo1iLicGFoMW9UWapaLihNjUKpJSMEdFkokXf kMw6aECeYZ3DM1b/lUQGqPmWPg5TlZLVcR59r7aUr3DyLknE7dXeif5h8cbbLlDFwIFoHlp mYQU60eOpi6q+lwUIhfBQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:45:12 -0000 On 12.01.2015 18:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 12 janvier 2015 17:59:36 +0100 Stefan Ehmann wrote: > | > | But it would be nice to have a poudriere option to avoid rebuilds of > | ports without version bumps. If something should go horribly wrong every > | now and then, you can still fall back to the default rebuild behavior. > | > | I think it should be possibly provided that port versions are bumped > | correctly. But maybe I'm wrong. > > Like someone else said, you can use bulk -S, but don't complain if you end > up with something that's horribly broken :-) bulk -S didn't really work well for me (see original post). But I think I my original question is answered by now: There's no supported way of avoiding excessive rebuilds with poudriere. What I'm now doing is: * Dry run of poudriere bulk with normal list of ports * make a list of ports that will be rebuilt because of new version * Run poudriere bulk with new list There are still some ports without version bump rebuilt, but it's a much smaller number. Especially libreoffice/KDE, etc. rebuilds are avoided. This procedure probably has some issues. But in case of problems I'll just do a normal incremental build.