From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 21:29:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ACB16A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BF443FE9 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:29:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07A4836E49; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:27:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042A034422; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:27:01 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:27:00 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: James Read In-Reply-To: <003401c3ab01$e9154c70$c000000a@jd2400> Message-ID: <20031115012534.N4021@ganymede.hub.org> References: <003401c3ab01$e9154c70$c000000a@jd2400> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel panic on 4.9-release with nullfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 05:29:06 -0000 On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, James Read wrote: > > But now after some minutes the same crash. I made some other > > dump: > > > > 1: one nullfs-mounted jail at init 6: reboot after panic: null_checkvp > > http://turando.felvi.hu/crash/crash_2.tgz (~430M) > > http://turando.felvi.hu/crash/gdb.out.2 > > > > > > 2: simply nullfs mounted jails: 2xbind9 (etc,named.conf+zone files,usr); > > oops proxy(etc,usr); mysqld(etc,usr), djbdns (etc,usr) > > > > Hi, I run sevral jails on 4.9 with a heavey usage of mount_nullfs with > absolutly no crashes or had any problems with it, same with 4.8 (upgraded > from 4.8 to 4.9, no mount_nullfs changes to the box) > > In the jails, I run bind,samba,apache,smtp/imap > server(maildir),squid,mysqld,sshd,pureftpd. > > This is my mount output: > > bash-2.05b# mount > /dev/ad1s1a on / (ufs, local) > /dev/ad1s1f on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad1s1g on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad1s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) > procfs on /proc (procfs, local) > /dev/ad3s1 on xxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad4s1 on xxxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad5s1 on xxxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) > /dev/ad6s1 on xxxxx(ufs, local, soft-updates) > /usr/ports on /usr/local/jails/xxxxxxx/usr/ports (null, local) > /usr/ports on /usr/local/jails/xxxxxxxxx/usr/ports (null, local) > /usr/ports on /usr/local/jails/xxxxxx/usr/ports (null, local) k, based on this, all you use nullfs for is mounting ports ... in Kovacs case, he's got the / running off of it ... there are known issues with this, especially if any application creates an AF_UNIX socket *on* the nullfs mounted file system ...