From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 15 21:03:52 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C1A106564A
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:03:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389758FC1F
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:03:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
	id 59E74730A1; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:13:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:13:34 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
Message-ID: <20100315211334.GB95605@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <20100315183132.GA94552@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
	<201003151857.o2FIvOCW081355@lurza.secnetix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201003151857.o2FIvOCW081355@lurza.secnetix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Small problem with "ipfw list"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:03:52 -0000

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:57:24PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> 
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>  > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:36:15PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>  > > Hi,
>  > > 
>  > > Just a question:  Is the output from "ipfw list" supposed
>  > > to be in the same rule format that is accepted as input?
>  > > If that's the case, then there is a small bug:
>  > > 
>  > > # ipfw add 100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or 2.2.2.2 '}'
>  > > 00100 allow ip from any to '{' 1.1.1.1 or dst-ip 2.2.2.2 '}'
>  > 
>  > ok this should be fixed now in head (revision 205179)
> 
> Great, thank you very much for doing this!
> 
> Do you think this could be merged to stable/8 and stable/7?

it's a trivial change to the userland program so whoever wants
to do the merge is welcome. I should be able to merge to stable/8
perhaps next monday, whereas for stable/7 perhaps we should wait for the
code freeze to end ?

cheers
luigi