From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep 13 21:04:04 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA16525
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Sep 1995 21:04:04 -0700
Received: from healer.com (healer-gw.Empire.Net [205.164.80.204])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA16511
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Sep 1995 21:03:59 -0700
Received: (from gryphon@localhost) by healer.com (8.6.11/8.6.9.1) id AAA03605; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:05:00 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:05:00 -0400
From: Coranth Gryphon <gryphon@healer.com>
Message-Id: <199509140405.AAA03605@healer.com>
To: gryphon@healer.com, noses@oink.rhein.de
Subject: Re: smfs
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com, owensc@enc.edu,
        terry@lambert.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

From: noses@oink.rhein.de (Noses)
> I love it when people are talking about PCs in general - I guess a PC
> running FreeBSD DOES know about the "unix side of a transaction". But
> a number of other operating systems aren't that blind either (e.g. Win NT,
> Win 95 (getting it's user database from a Netware server) or even OS/2). 

<sigh>

OK. PC's running Windows. Which is what SMB was designed for and around.

I wasn't talking about NT (and you don't really get security there
unless you run NTFS partitions) nor OS/2 (which I ignore on general
principals) or Netware (which doesn't talk SMB either).

I was using "PC" in the general sense of the term, not translating
it to "Intel-based hardware platform".

-coranth

------------------------------------------+------------------------+
Coranth Gryphon <gryphon@healer.com>      |  "Faith Manages."      |
                                          |        - Satai Delenn  |
Phone: 603-598-3440   Fax: 603-598-3430   +------------------------+
USMail: 11 Carver St, Nashua, NH  03060
Disclaimer: All these words are yours, except Europa...