From owner-freebsd-security Wed Dec 6 6: 3:45 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 06:03:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from saturn.innonet.at (saturn.innonet.at [194.152.190.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2F437B401 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 06:03:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from saturn.innonet.at (IDENT:pm@saturn.innonet.at [194.152.190.3]) by saturn.innonet.at (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eB6E33s20503; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:03:03 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:03:03 +0100 (MET) From: Manfred Petz X-Sender: pm@saturn.innonet.at To: Alexander Gavrilov Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TIS Firewall Tookit In-Reply-To: <200012061332.eB6DWDl03448@haba.uven.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Alexander Gavrilov wrote: | Hi people! | What do you think about TIS Firewall Toolkit? | Thanks. I've been using it for years and I regret it. I had to apply tons of patches to fix various problems with http-gw and smap (3rd party relay). A couple of times I even had to debug and fix problems by myself because either there was no patch or I couldn't find out where to get a patch. TIS is supporting only it's commercial version, Gauntlet. And understandably they have no great ambitions for FWTK. If you dont't want to or can't use SOCKS then for a proxy based firewall you may take a look at delegate(1). I'm using it at one site (though I don't have much experience with it). pm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message